BigSkyMX or MercuryX: The Ultimate Reverb Shootout

May 22, 2024 | Alan

Show Video Transcript

Not since Taylor Swift’s breakout hit “Bad Blood” have we seen such a rivalry. Rumor has it, this comparison between the Strymon BigSkyMX (BSMX) and the Meris MercuryX will break the internet. As a wise person once said, “show Kim Kardashian what men really want on the internet…”

I’m not sure what all that means, but I know this side-by-side comparison has been eagerly awaited since the announcement of the BSMX. As the new and improved big brother to the original BigSky, how does it stack up against the MercuryX Stereo Modular Reverb? Both pedals are priced in the $600-$700 range and boast powerful reverbs, but which one is truly the best?

Enhanced Features and Processing Power

The BSMX boasts triple the processing power of its predecessor and the ability to load impulse responses (IRs), allowing for real-space reverb captures. The MercuryX, while lacking IR capabilities, excels in its modular approach, offering more tweakable parameters and the ability to deeply customize the reverb’s characteristics.

Presets and Footswitches

The BSMX can hold up to 300 presets, while the MercuryX holds 99. However, the MercuryX allows for presets to be offloaded and shared, something that’s currently limited on the BSMX due to Strymon’s software constraints. In terms of footswitches, the BSMX offers A and B footswitches with an additional infinite switch, while the MercuryX provides three footswitches for presets and a fourth hold modifier switch. This allows the MercuryX to control more parameters on the fly, making it more versatile in live settings.

Tuner and Knob Layout

The MercuryX includes a built-in tuner, a handy feature not present in the BSMX. One criticism of the BSMX is its algorithm selector knob, which is printed on the hardware. This limits Strymon’s ability to add new algorithms without them appearing out of place. The MercuryX, with its digital menu, can easily integrate new algorithms without such issues.

Parameter Customization

The BSMX offers fewer parameters for customization compared to the MercuryX. For example, the MercuryX allows detailed adjustments of the decay for mids, bass, treble, pre-delay, and more, while the BSMX’s adjustments are more limited. The MercuryX allows users to assign different functions to its knobs, providing a more customizable experience.

Dual Reverbs & IR Capabilities

The BSMX’s standout feature is its ability to run dual reverbs in parallel, series, or split configurations, and load IRs. This gives it a significant edge in terms of versatility and sound design, which is something the MercuryX cannot do. However, the MercuryX’s approach to reverb and modulation offers extensive tweakability and a wide range of customization options.

Sound Comparisons

  1. Plate Reverb: The BSMX’s plate reverb is warm and enveloping, providing a rich stereo spread. The MercuryX’s plate reverb, while high-fidelity, lacks the warmth of the BSMX.
  2. Cloud w/ Ensemble: The BSMX excels with its Cloud algorithm, especially with the Ensemble mode, which adds a string orchestra feel. The MercuryX’s attempt to mimic this using pitch modulation is commendable but doesn’t quite match the BSMX’s warmth.
  3. Circle Mod: This effect on the BSMX offers a modulated reverb that encircles the listener. The MercuryX’s version, while similar, doesn’t capture the initial attack as effectively.
  4. Spring: The MercuryX’s spring reverb is more authentic and spring-like compared to the BSMX’s attempt, which sounds more like a thop than a true spring reverb.

Conclusion

Both pedals offer unique advantages. The BSMX shines with its dual reverb capabilities and warmth, while the MercuryX offers unparalleled customization and modularity. Your choice will depend on your specific needs and preferences. For detailed preset downloads and further exploration, join our Patreon community.